| |
Contract Number: 4600001799 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Contract Approval Date: March 28, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Contract Start Date: June 15, 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Contract End Date: June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reporting Period: December 1 thru December 31, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROGRAM TASK DESCRIPTIONS |
Planned Complete |
Actual Complete |
Percent Complete |
|
Comments |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TASK 1: Administration and Organization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task 1a: Identify and appoint Coalition Coordinator |
Oct, 2001 |
Oct, 2001 |
100% |
|
Coordinator, Steve Haze started 10/1 under BOR funds |
|
|
Task 1b: Create a comprehensive mailing list of landowners
and other stakeholders in the watershed. |
April, 2002 |
Apr, 2002 |
100% |
|
List of 2500 landowners, 55 Stakeholder, local Government
groups and 5 newspapers |
|
|
Task 1c: Contact stakeholders by mail and in person to
encourage participation |
May,2002 |
May, 2002 |
100% |
|
Notice to Property owners sent out via USPS on 5/6,
Packages sent to Chairs of Fresno & Madera County Board of
Supervisors, (55) Stakeholder interests received package via email
distribution |
|
|
Task 1d: Prepare and send press releases concerning the
formation of the MAWC to media outlets |
May, 2002 |
May, 2002 |
100% |
|
Press Release Packages Sent to (8) reporters representing
(5) newspapers - 5/6 |
|
|
Task 1e: Convene formative meeting |
May, 2002 |
May, 2002 |
100% |
|
Formative meeting conducted in Friant on 5/23/02 (2.5)
hrs. 80 participants w/ approx. 50% property owners in proposed watershed
study area |
|
|
Task 1f: Form Steering Committee, sub-committees |
June, 2002 |
Aug, 2002 |
100% |
|
Steering Committee formed - 6/27. Chair & Vice Chair
selected - 7/25. Assessment Sub-committee formed 7/22 - current membership
(4). 1st session held 7/22. State/Federal Technical Advisory Committee
formed with Current membership (6). Group determined that other
Sub-committees to be formed as required - 8/22 |
|
|
Task 1g: Convene a minimum of 16 Steering Committee
meetings |
Oct, 2003 |
|
38% |
|
6th Steering Committee December 12th. Current Steering
Committee membership (18) w/ (4) Alternates. |
| |
Task 1h: Convene a minimum of 8 Coalition meetings |
Nov, 2003 |
|
38% |
|
4th Coalition meeting scheduled for January 8, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Task Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The products from this task will include: a comprehensive
mailing list, press releases, agendas and minutes from 24 meetings, as
well as a fully formed Steering Committee and Coalition |
|
|
|
|
Task Products - Comprehensive Mailing list in excess of
2,500 developed. (12) volunteers @ (2) hrs. ea. Web site contains meeting
calendar and materials. Fresno Bee reported on Steering Committee
formation and selection of Officers on 8/13/02. 1st meeting minutes
adopted 9/26 (August General meeting) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Success Criteria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Success will be measured by completion of each project
task according to the timetable, the reporting of coalition activities in
local newspapers, having a quorum present at all Steering Committee
Meetings, having a minimum of 40 stakeholders participate in Coalition
meetings and having those participants represent at least six different
categories of stakeholders (e.g. rancher, homeowner, federal agency,
sportsmen, policy maker, scientist, etc.) |
|
|
|
|
Success Criteria exceeded for 1st meeting - (80)
Stakeholders representing (12) categories. Steering Committee makes up
(10) categories. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TASK 2: Training and Outreach |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task 2a: Conduct a total of 4 community education sessions
on topics related to watershed protection, restoration, management, and
monitoring |
Nov, 2003 |
|
25% |
|
Educational presentation on noxious weeds and other
non-native invasive plant species to be conducted by Joanna Clines,
Chairperson for the San Joaquin-Sierra Noxious Weeds Alliance - 1/8/03 |
|
|
Task 2b: Make a total of 8 informational mailings to all
stakeholders including meeting schedules, agendas, minutes, report
summaries, public policy issues and other information of interest
regarding watersheds |
Nov, 2003 |
|
50% |
|
Meeting Announcements, Press releases, agendas and
presentation materials mailed, emailed and posted on web-site. Meeting
Minutes on-going since 8/22 session |
|
|
Task 2c: Share information regarding the activities of the
Millerton Area Watershed Coalition with the general public through press
releases and community presentations |
Nov, 2003 |
|
50% |
|
1st Press Release - Informational & Formation sent
out on 5/6/02. 2nd Press Release - Steering Committee Formed sent out on
8/6. 3rd - Press Release on Noxious Weeds presentation sent out to all
local newspapers on 12/23. Property Owner Notification - 4/23/02.
Visioning Workshop 5/31/02 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Task Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The products from this task include: training materials,
coalition mailing packets, and press releases. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Success Criteria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Success will be measured by attendance of at least 40
people at training sessions, their feedback, and completed evaluation
forms; more informed participation in coalition meetings; and increased
interest in citizen monitoring activities. |
|
|
|
|
Evaluation form to be developed for January educational
presentation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TASK 3: Assessment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task 3a: Identification of major stressors and threats to
the Millerton Area Watershed with input from a wide range of stakeholders. |
June, 2002 |
June, 2002 |
100% |
|
Input provided by Visioning workshop participants |
|
|
Task 3b: Gather and review current and historical data on
the watershed processes to establish, as much as possible, a baseline |
May, 2003 |
|
40% |
|
(1) session in December and (8) planning session to date.
Assessment Components identified (scope), major responsibilities assigned
and report format drafted. Tracking worksheet developed with key
activities and new target dates. Guidline for structuring content
developed. Developed draft of individual status reporting form. On-going
Steering committee review of progress. |
|
|
Task 3c: Evaluate current conditions and use patterns |
June, 2002 |
|
40% |
|
• Establishment of Sources and Data Collection
o Meeting with Pam Buford, RWQCB and Dawn Carlton, Water
Quality Assessment Lead – 12/18
o Meeting with Don Nielsen, NRCS Madera County and
request for information to Dave Durham for soils maps by Joe Middleton,
lead for Erosion, Sediment and Soils Assessment Lead
o Meeting with Craig Poole, Fresno City College,
Geological history – 12/27
o Request for Information – Mario Santoyo, Friant Water
Users Authority – Water appropriations and water quality testing
o Request for meeting – Neil McDougald, UCD Cooperative
Extension, Water quality studies at San Joaquin Experimental Range
o Request for meeting – Michael Morrato, CSUF – Tree
Ring climate studies (Dendrochronology)
o Request for Information – Clark Londquist, USGS
Ground water Hydrologist |
|
|
Task 3d: Working with partners, collect additional data
especially where there are significant gaps in the database. |
Jan, 2003 |
|
25% |
|
|
|
|
Task 3e: Prepare a written assessment report to be
circulated and shared by all interested parties |
Nov, 2003 |
|
25% |
|
Assessment report organization and format drafted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Task Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The products from this task will include: lists and
inventories of watershed conditions, summaries of research reviewed or
tests conducted, and a written assessment report. |
|
|
|
|
8th Assessment Team mtgs held on 12/10. Continued
activities on data collection phase of assessment - target complete -
4/30/03. Assessment components responsibilities have been assigned.
Tentative timeline for drafted baseline assessment still 8/30/03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Success Criteria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The success of this task will be measured by the
completion of the assessment report by the target date, the participation
in the assessment by stakeholders from at least 8 different stakeholder
categories, and the ability to fill in as many data gaps as possible. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TASK 4: Collaboration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task 4a: Compile a list of potential collaborators among
watershed groups and other agencies and organizations |
April, 2002 |
April, 2002 |
100% |
|
Listing of potential collaborators established. Two
Pre-program planning sessions held with agency groups |
|
|
Task 4b: Maintain frequent contact with other watershed
groups for the purpose of sharing ideas, strategies and data. |
Nov, 2003 |
|
55% |
|
On-going participation with Central Sierra Watershed
Committee, Water Advisory Committees for Madera & Fresno Counties,
Sierra-San Joaquin Noxious Weeds Alliance, Coarsegold and Sierra RCD's.
Participation as Stakeholder for Friant Storage Investigation program
under USBR/DWR (CALFED). |
|
|
Task 4c: Maintain frequent contact with local, regional
and national organizations with an interest in conservation or watershed
protection and restoration. |
Nov, 2003 |
|
55% |
|
On-going attendance at monthly CALFED Watershed Advisory
Committee meetings. Session on 12/5 with Sierra Nevada Alliance and Sierra
Los Tulares Land Trust. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This will produce ready reference files with technical
reports, guides and documents produced by these groups that will assist
the MAWC to complete their assessment activities and learn about
successful watershed management programs. It will also produce
correspondence and other evidence that the MAWC has shared its data and
other information with these organizations. |
|
|
|
|
Website established as repository for technical
publications and reports. Hyperlinks to key watershed agencies and
resources. Resource Documents being collected. Assessment section added to
website. Technical Advisory Committee includes: USBR, USBLM, CDWR, RWQCB,
CDFG, CDF, CDPR & NRCS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Success Criteria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The success of this task will be measured by the number
of collaborators involved (10 or more) and the frequency and duration of
contact. |
|
|
|
|
Current Collaborators(11) (as of 11/30): Sierra RCD,
Coarsegold RCD, Central Sierra Watershed Committee, North Fork Community
Development Council, Yosemite-Sequoia RC&D Council, Fresno Co. Water
Advisory Committee, Madera Co Water Oversight Committee, Highway 168 Fire
Safe Council, ISIS Center, California State University - Fresno, Millerton
Lake Area Chamber of Commerce, Sierra-San Joaquin Noxious Weed Alliance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TASK 5: Planning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task 5a: Develop and implement a funding plan for the
continuation of the coalition. |
Oct, 2003 |
|
33% |
|
Discussion held w/ Sierra Nevada Alliance for possible
funding - follow-on in January. Attended NRCS sessions on Farm Bill &
conservation programs - 12/2 & 12/4 |
|
|
Task 5b: Develop a funding and implementation plan for the
creation of a comprehensive watershed management plan. |
Nov, 2003 |
|
33% |
|
Upper Finegold Watershed Assessment Proposal under Prop
13 approved by State Water Resources Control Board on 10/17. Will take 9
to 12 mo's before program commences. Attended NRCS sessions on Farm Bill
& conservation programs - 12/2 & 12/4. Sierra RCD scheduled to
review Long Range Plan in January. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This task will produce commitments from local agencies
and organizations for the funds required to continue the operation of the
Millerton Area Watershed Coalition. It will also produce at least 3
potential sources for the funds necessary to create a watershed management
plan. |
|
|
|
|
Potential Sources for funding include: CALFED, USBR Prop
40, Prop 50 and NRCS, & FWUA |
|
|
Success Criteria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The success of this task will be measured by whether or
not the community mobilizes the resources necessary to maintain the
coalition. It will also be measured by the number of grantors that show
some interest in funding the management plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TASK 6: Reporting and Presentations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task 6a: Prepare comprehensive quarterly progress reports
on all aspects of project implementation |
April, 2003 |
|
38% |
|
3rd Quarterly report submitted 12/31/02 |
|
|
Task 6b: Prepare a draft final report that summarizes all
project activities and accomplishments over the two year period. Send a
draft copy to CALFED for comments and observations. |
May, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task 6c: Revise draft final report to include comments
from CALFED and submit |
June, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task 6d: Deliver final summary presentation(s) to CALFED
as requested. |
June, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This task will produce 8 quarterly reports, a final
report, and presentation materials. |
|
|
|
|
3 reports submitted. 4th report scheduled for early
April, 2003 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Success Criteria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The success of this task will be measured by the
accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the reports and presentations.
All should provide a good reflection of all project activities,
accomplishments and problems. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|